|
Dr. Kenneth L. Feder
|

|
Introduction to Archaeology | |
|
The Ancient World | |
|
Before History | |
|
New England Prehistory | |
|
Experimental Archaeology | |
|
North American Prehistory | |
|
Data Analysis | |
|
Field School in Archaeology |
Summer Archaeological Field School Photos
Kenny Feder, Department of Anthropology
Office: 110 D DiLoreto
Office phone: 832-2615
E-mail: Feder@ccsu.edu
Course Outline
I. IN THE BEGINNING
1) Introduction
2) What archaeology isn't—Read Unit 1 in Feder
3) Archaeology: definitions and origins
4) Garbage is truth – Unit 2 and Unit 3
5) In search of the past; site survey – Unit 4
☉6) Digging in the dirt – Unit 5, Unit 9; CD EXTRA: Slideshow: Firetown Meadow
7) Dating methods in archaeology – Unit 6
8) More dating methods – Unit 6
EXAM 1
II. ANALYSIS OF PAST SOCIETIES
☉1) Gravestone project: CD EXTRA: Slideshow: Gravestones
2) Reconstructing the environmental context – Unit 8
3) Material culture; you are what you make – Unit 10
4) Paleo-economy; you are what you eat – Unit 11
5) Social systems – Unit 12
6) Settlement patterns – Unit 7
7) I see dead people – Unit 13
8) Living in the past; archaeology by experiment – Unit 10
9) Ethnoarchaeology
EXAM 2
III. CASE STUDIES IN ARCHAEOLOGY – Unit 14 and Unit 15
1) The Glazier Blade Cache
☉2) This Old Pyramid: CD EXTRA:Photo Notebook: Egypt
☉☉3) Ancestors of the Hopi: CD EXTRA: Photo Notebook: Mesa Verde,
Photo Notebook: Petroglyphs
☉4) The Mystery of the Maya; CD EXTRA: Photo Notebook: Maya
5) Other People’s Garbage
6) A Village of Outcasts: Archaeology of the Lighthouse community
7) Archaeology and the Search for Columbus
8) Is there a future for the past?
EXAM 3
Required texts: Linking to the Past: A Brief Introduction to Archaeology by Feder (with the accompanying cd). “☉” above indicates additional material on cd packaged with book. Grading: Three exams (each contributes 25% to your final grade) and the gravestone project (25% of your final grade; look at the CD EXTRA: Slideshow: Gravestones).Introduction to Archaeology
Gravestone Project
Archaeologists study the material remains of human
behavior (sound familiar?). We can study directly the remains of the
things that people made and draw conclusions about how they made
them. However, as we have seen and will continue to see in this
class, artifacts can be analyzed for more than just technological
information. They also can be looked at in terms of their economic,
social, political, and ideological implications. Remember;
archaeologists can directly study only the things that people made.
These things are a direct reflection of the technology of the society
in which they were made. But artifacts are not made and used in a
vacuum. Things are not made and used in isolation from other aspects
of the society. Everything that people make or do is accomplished
directly or indirectly within the context of the economic, social,
political, and even ideological systems of their society.
In order for you to understand how archaeologists can reconstruct all
this juicy, non-technological stuff about people just by analyzing
the garbage they left behind, you are going to become archaeologists
of historic American culture--archaeologists without shovels, that
is. Specifically, you are going to study a very important artifact of
17th-, 18th-, and 19th-century American culture--gravestones.
Gravestones
Monuments marking the graves of people provide an enormous amount
of data. They have particular shapes, designs, and messages (that,
luckily, we can read), that provide a great deal of information about
the people buried beneath them and about the society in which they
lived. Of course, they reflect the technology of the society which
made them and we can study how they were made. But, especially for
these artifacts, it is easy to understand that they also reflect the
religious and social beliefs of the people who made and erected them.
As archaeologists, we should be able through careful analysis to
reconstruct such "non-material" aspects of culture, and that is the
point of this assignment. Your job will be the same as any
archaeologist's except your data will be above the ground. You are
presented with artifacts (gravestones) and you wish to learn more
about the people who made and used them.
Strategy
The class will divide itself into a number of separate groups of
between six and eight members. Each person in each group will visit a
cemetery in New England containing gravestones dating from
before 1880. In a systematic fashion, each of you
should record as much information as you can for a minimum of
twenty-five gravestones including:
1. Name of the deceased
2. Birth date of the deceased
3. Sex of the deceased
4. Date of death
5. Cause of death (if given)
6. Shape of the stone
7. Size of the stone
8. Raw material of the stone (reddish brown=sandstone; crumbly
white=unpolished marble; black-speckled gray=granite; smooth,
black=slate)
9. Design on the stone
10. Epitaph
11. Anything else that seems important.
It is important that all members of a group collect the same
information since the data within each group will be pooled by them
for analysis.
Analysis
Each group will then pool the data collected by all group members.
Your total, pooled sample, should be between 150 and 200 stones.
Using the pooled data only (all of the stones collected by the
members of your group), each person in the group must choose a
different one of the following and perform the necessary
analysis to answer the question posed:
1. How does gravestone design change through time?
2. Can you analyze the economic make-up of your historic communities
based on tombstones (based on, for example, size and raw material of
the stones)?
3. Are men and women treated differently in this society?
4. Are young and old treated differently in this society?
5. What was the view of the afterlife and did it change through
time?
6. Can you describe the demography of the society?
7. Was there a monthly pattern to the death rate in the society?
8. Is there a pattern to the origin of the first names given
people?
Here are a few other important points:
I. Do not attempt to answer all of these questions for just your 25
stones. Each group member needs to chose only ONE of these
questions and answer it using the pooled sample from the entire
group.
II. On a title page for your individual write-up of this report, you
must provide a listing of the names of the members of your group
who provided you with information, the number of stones each
group member provided you information on, and the total number of
stones you used in your analysis. In this way, I can readily tell
who, if anyone, in your group did not participate in the project.
They (not you) will receive an "F" for the project. No
exceptions.
Other Important Stuff
EACH PERSON MUST HAND IN TWO REPORTS.
1. You need to write a detailed description of the cemetery you
visited: where is it, how big is it, what is the layout of the
stones, how did you choose your sample, how does your cemetery
compare to the others in your group, is there anything particularly
interesting or outstanding about your graveyard? Appended to this
report must be the raw data you collected for each of the 25 or so
stones you examined and included in your analysis.
2. You need also to write up your group project analysis. In other
words, you need to answer the question you selected and provide a
discussion of the analysis you performed to answer that question
using the pooled data sample for your group.
Both reports must be typed. Raw data from your cemetery need
not be typed.
DUE DATE
Each member of each group will present their analysis of the
question they selected (the second of their reports) in class on
DECEMBER 5 The entire project consisting of both of your
reports is due on DECEMBER 10. The due date is not a vague
suggestion. Failure to show up on December 5 for the in-class
presentation and/or handing in the final project after December 10
will result in a substantial lowering of your grade (a full grade
lower for failure to show on the 2nd, and/or half a grade deduction
for each day after the 7th that you hand in the write-up late).
All group members depend on each other to get their data in so the
rest of their group will have adequate time to incorporate everyone
else's data into their group report. If your raw data cannot
be included in the group analysis by other members of your group
because you did not get it in to them in a timely manner, then
you will not get a passing grade for the project. No one
else's grade in the group will suffer. Since all members must list
the names of group members who submitted data for their group report,
it will be obvious who is trying to slide by.
Your grade will depend entirely on the reports you hand
in. NOT ALL GROUP MEMBERS WILL GET THE SAME GRADE.
Most Important
Have fun doing this project. There are only two other rules:
1. don't visit your cemetery at night
2. don't dig anyone up.
THE ANCIENT WORLD--ANTH 210
Kenny Feder
Office: DiLoreto 110 D---Hours: Tuesday/Thursday, 12:30-2:00; Wednesday, 12:00-2:00
Phone: 832-2615; E-mail feder@ccsu.edu
COURSE OUTLINE
I. In the beginning...
1) Introduction and stuff -- Preface
2) What do you think? A brief survey-- Chapter 1
3) Experiments in the paranormal
4) How to reason; the workings of science -- Chapter 2
5) A case in point: The Bermuda Triangle
6) The case of the "psychic detective": You solve it
1) Human evolution: the scientific approach
2) How to spot a fraud: the archaeology of giants -- Chapter 3
3) Piltdown Man: Whodunnit? -- Chapter 4
4) Peking Man: Anatomy of an unsolved mystery
5) Cryptozoology: animals unseen
6) The Loch Ne$$ Monster
1) Evolution, God, and the Bible – Chapter 11 (pp. 278-292; 295-310)
2) Flintstones archaeology -- Chapter 11 (pp. 292-295)
IV. Who Discovered Columbusland?
1) Who's on first? Who's next? -- Chapter 5
2) The Myth of the Moundbuilders -- Chapter 6
3) Cahokia
1) How to build a pyramid: Mysterious Egypt? – Chapter 9
2) The mystery of the megaliths -- Chapter 12 (pp.321-331)
3) Stonehenge; how did they do it?
VI. Just Weird
1) The archaeology of flying saucers: Roswell
2) The archaeology of Mars: The Mars Face(less)
1) The Lost Continent of Atlantis -- Chapter 7
2) The case for ancient astronauts -- Chapter 8
3) Crash go the chariots
4) And the moral is... Chapter 12 (pp. 311-321, 331-333)
Text: Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries, 5th edition; by Feder
Grading: Two exams (30% each), media journal (30%), psychic detective assignment (10%), class participation.
The Ancient World -- Running Journal
Before History -- Anthropology 215 -- Feder
1. On Origins
1.1: Where do we come from? The Past in Perspective (PIP) 1
1.2: Creation stories
1.3: The roots of a western concept of antiquity: John Ray
1.4: The roots of a western concept of antiquity: Charles Darwin
1.5: The first 4.995 billion years (at 66,600,000 years per minute)—PIP 2
1.6: Miocene Perpspectives—PIP 3: pp. 65-70
2. Hominid Evolution
2.1: Walking upright—PIP 3: pp 71-83
2.2: Making tools – PIP 3: pp 83-104
2.3: Populating the world—PIP 4
2.4:The Neandertals - PIP 5
2.5: The evolution of us — PIP 6
2.6: Evolution: Replacement or multi-regional?
3. Cultural Developments
3.1: The artistic explosion: Paleolithic cave-painters of Europe -- PIP 7
3.2: New Worlds: Populating the Americas -- PIP 8
3.3: New Worlds: Populating the Pacific -- PIP 8
3.4: The Mesolithic: Prelude or interlude? -- PIP 9
4. The Neolithic
4.1: The food producing revolution: hypotheses-- PIP 10
4.2: The Near East
4.3: The Far East
4.4: Mesoamerica and South America
4.5: Europe
4.6: Africa
4.7: North America
5. Civilization
5.1: The urban revolution: hypotheses -- PIP 11
5.2: Mesopotamia — PIP 12
5.3: Egypt
5.4: India
5.5: China
5.6: Mesoamerica — PIP 13
5.7: South America
5.8: Europe
5.9: Africa
5.10: North America—PIP 14
5.11: Southeast Asia
6. Epilogue: PIP 15
Required Texts: The Past in Perspective (3rd edition) by Feder
Grading: Origin Myth Paper (10%); Mid-term (30% of your final grade), final (30%), term paper (30%).
The purpose of this paper is for you to select a question(s) from the
following list that you find interesting, to conduct a bit of
research on that question, and to write a short (10 page paper) in
which you attempt to provide an answer to the question(s).
1. How was Stonehenge built and what was its purpose?
2. How were the cave paintings of the European Upper Paleolithic
rendered? What was their purpose?
3. What happened to the Neandertals? Are they our direct ancestors or
an extinct offshoot of the hominid line?
4. How were Egyptian pyramids constructed?
5. What caused the collapse of the Maya civilization?
6. What caused the extinction of large game animals at the end of the
Pleistocene in North America?
7. When was the New World first settled by human beings?
8. Was Minoan Crete the historical model for Plato's Atlantis?
9. How were the Easter Island statues constructed?
10. How old is the Sphinx and how was it made?
11. Was the prehistoric Native American community of Cahokia a true
city?
12. Who was Tutankamun and what is his historical significance?
13. Who were the Olmec and how do they relate to Mesoamerican
civilization?
14. How do the Indus cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro reflect
concepts of urban planning?
15. How did the Inca maintain their enormous empire without a written
language?
16. How is bipedalism advantageous?
17. Do the Venus Figurines of the European Paleolithic imply the
existence of a mother goddess or a fertility cult?
18. In their artistic depictions, do books published about human
prehistory in the last twenty years convey stereotypes about the
sexual division of labor among our ancient ancestors?
19. When did our ancient human ancestors first begin to depict
celestial phenomena? What was their purpose?
20. When and how were the Pacific Islands populated initially by a
people with no navigational devices?
Your paper must be typed, double-spaced, at least 10 pages long (but
no more than 12 pages), and your bibliography must contain no fewer
than five references.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ERA |
PERIOD |
EPOCH |
TIME |
EVENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENOZOIC |
QUATERNARY |
HOLOCENE |
10 Thousand |
|
|
|
|
PLEISTOCENE |
2 Million years ago |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERTIARY |
PLIOCENE |
5 MYA |
Hominids |
|
|
|
MIOCENE |
25 |
Apes |
|
|
|
OLIGOCENE |
38 |
Monkeys |
|
|
|
EOCENE |
55 |
|
|
|
|
PALEOCENE |
65 |
Mammals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MESOZOIC |
CRETACEOUS |
|
135 |
|
|
|
JURASSIC |
|
200 |
|
|
|
TRIASSIC |
|
250 |
Dinosaurs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PALEOZOIC |
PERMIAN |
|
280 |
Reptiles |
|
|
PENNSYLVANIAN |
|
310 |
|
|
|
MISSISSIPPIAN |
|
345 |
|
|
|
DEVONIAN |
|
405 |
Amphibians |
|
|
SILURIAN |
|
425 |
Land plants |
|
|
ORDOVICIAN |
|
500 |
Vertebrates |
|
|
CAMBRIAN |
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRECAMBRIAN |
|
|
700 |
Multi-celled life |
|
|
|
|
3400 |
First life |
|
|
|
|
4000 |
Oldest rocks |
|
|
|
|
4500 |
Age of Earth |
|
|
Earth Chronology |
|
|
New England Prehistory
Syllabus
Feder: DiLoreto 110D
832-2615: feder@ccsu.edu
I. Contexts:
1. Introduction
2. First Contact: Historical explanations for the origin of the native peoples of the New World
3. Scientific explanations for the origin of the native peoples of the New World: The history of prehistory in America
4. The history of prehistory: New England
5. New England natural history: Geological History of The Farmington Valley--a case in point
6. New England natural history: The palynological record
7. Eco-regions, habitats, and micro-environments: Modern analogs for New England's past – PALEOENVIRONMENT ASSIGNMENT
8. Models of the past: The Southern New England Ethnohistory Project (SNEEP)
II. Culture History:
9. Who's on first?
10. Paleo-Indian adaptations
11. The Paleo-Indian period in Connecticut: 6LF21
12. Post-Pleistocene change
13. Archaic adaptations: Early and Middle
14. Alsop Meadow
15. Firetown Meadow
16. Archaic adaptations: Late
17. Woodchuck Knoll
18. The Woodland Period: Continuity and change
19. Wood Lily
20. Firetown North
21. Tulmeadow
22. Glazier Blades
III. History
23. First contact
24. Acculturation
25. Trade and warfare in the Woodland
26. SNEEP reports
27. Reservations, renewal, and slot machines: The future
Grading: Mid-term (20%) and final exam (20%). Paleo-environment assignment (in class presentation and short written report - 20%) and SNEEP term project (40%). There is no textbook for this class.
SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND ETHNOHISTORY PROJECT
Goal:
The overall goal of the Southern New
England Ethnohistory Project (SNEEP)
is to produce a model of aboriginal culture that will be useful in
describing and explaining the prehistoric societies of New
England.
Approach:
The approach in SNEEP is ethnohistorical. The ethnohistorical record
of New England provides a data base from the sixteenth, seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries consisting of descriptions of aboriginal
lifeways. Our (in other words, your) job is to collect
ethnohistorical information and use it as the basis of our model of
prehistoric culture.
Methodology:
Your job in the SNEEP project will be to read an ethnohistorical
source from the sixteenth, seventeenth, or eighteenth centuries. This
will not be a casual or informal reading. In essence, your task will
be to read each sentence of the work and assess its significance and
meaning regarding aboriginal lifeways. Different works contain
different quantities of information -- obviously, not every sentence
will be of interest or value to us here. When you find information
relating in any way to the aboriginal cultures of New England, you
must copy the phrase, sentence, or paragraph (write it, type it, or
photocopy it) and place it on a SNEEP sheet (copy appended -- you'll
get lots of these). You need to code the information based on the
SNEEP codes provided here. These codes are similar to those used in
the Human Relation Area Files except that the SNEEP codes are focused
on material culture -- the kinds of things archaeologists are likely
to find. The rest of the SNEEP sheet is to be filled out as well (it
is largely self-explanatory).
Biographical report:
To best assess the value of a particular ethnohistorical work, we
need to know about the source of the information. Therefore, you will
need to provide a brief biographical report concerning the
author/explorer/colonist/missionary who is the source of your
information. Based on your investigation of the source, you should be
able to come to some conclusions regarding the reliability of the
author particularly concerning his discussion of native lifeways.
Results:
By the last class of the semester you should have a huge pile of
SNEEP sheets, a biographical report, and a pretty good understanding
of the culture of aboriginal New England
as described by your
source. Putting the work of the
entire class together, we should be able to begin to put together a
model of aboriginal culture that will help us understand the lifeways
of their more ancient ancestors.
North American Prehistory
1. First impressions:
1.1 The world before 1492
1.2 The "new world" of Columbus -- Fagan 1
2. Archaeology
2.1 A period of speculation -- Fagan 2
2.2 A scientific approach to the past -- Fagan 3
3. The first Americans
3.1 It's all in the timing -- Fagan 4
3.2 Who's on first? -- Fagan 4
3.3 Siberia: Archaeology of the source
3.4 Asians in Alaska: Nenana and Denali
3.5 The Paleoindians -- Fagan 5
3.6 Paleoindian adaptations
3.7 The Lindenmeier site, Colorado
3.8 The Vail site, Maine -- Fagan 6
3.9 Megafauna extinction: whodunnit?
4. Post-Pleistocene Adaptation
4.1 The Archaic period
4.2 Eastern Archaic -- Fagan 16 & 17
4.3 Desert Archaic -- Fagan 12 & 13
4.4 Central Archaic -- Fagan 7
4.5 Arctic Archaic -- Chapter 8 & 9
4.6 The Koster site, Illinois
4.7 Connecticut's Archaic
5. Cultural Complexity
5.1 The Woodland Period
5.2 Adaptation to the Eastern Woodlands
5.3 Adena/Hopewell --Chapter 18 & 19
5.4 Temple Mound builders -- Chapter 20
5.5 Cahokia; a pre-Columbian city on the banks of the Mississippi
5.6 The American Southwest -- Chapter 14
5.7 Pueblos and cliff dwellers -- Chapter 15
6. Historical Contacts
6.1 De Soto in the American South -- Chapter 22
6.2 Jesuits and Hopi
6.3 Pilgrims and Pequots
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Text:
North American
Archaeology, by Brian Fagan
Grading: Mid-term (30%), Final (30%), and term paper (40%)
North American
Prehistory
Term Paper
The purpose of the term paper in this course is to have you research
a topic of controversy in North American prehistory. I want you to
chose (either from the list I will provide here, or a topic of your
own choosing) some issue that archaeologists
disagree
about. Your job is not to choose sides (although I do ask that you
come to a tentative decision), but to research both (or more than
two) sides of the issue, fairly present various opinions, and only
then come to some conclusion of your own.
Appropriate topics/questions include:
When was the New World first settled?
What role, if any, did the Paleoindians have in the extinction of
North America's megafauna at the end of the Pleistocene?
How did the prehistoric inhabitants of the New World readapt to
changing environments at the end of the Pleistocene (focus on one
area of North America)?
How important a resource was soapstone (steatite) to Indians in
northeastern North America?
Was a sedentary way of life possible in North America only after the
development of an agricultural economy?
Was the agricultural revolution in North America independent or
derived from Mesoamerican developments?
Was Mississipian culture (the Temple Mound Builders) derived from
Mesoamerica, or did it develop independently?
How widespread was the Norse incursion into North America in the
period A. D. 800 to A.D. 1400?
Why can't Native Americans and archaeologists "just get along." Can
the two groups work together and how?
Who "owns" the past of North America?
The term paper is due on the date scheduled for the final exam for
this class. The final two weeks of the semester before finals week
will be given over to you for the presentation of your report (each
presentation should last about 30 minutes or so).
The paper must be typed. It should be
no more than twenty-five
pages in length. It should be at
least twenty pages. You must adhere to the standard bibliographic
format for anthropology papers (we'll go over that in class and I
will provide you with a short handbook).
EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY
This course will prepare you for two things: to conduct scientific
experiments in material culture and to survive after World War III.
The course consists of laboratory/lectures. Most of the course
consists of hands-on work so missing classes and "getting the notes"
will not suffice. Plan on showing up to all of the classes or don't
take this course.
Syllabus
EXPERIMENTAL
ARCHAEOLOGY
Feder
Office: DiLoreto 110D
Office phone: 832-2615
Office hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays. 12:30-2:00; Wednesday, 12:00-2:00
e-mail: feder@ccsu.edu
This course will prepare you for two things: to conduct scientific experiments in material culture and to survive after World War III. The course consists of laboratory/lectures.
Most of the course consists of hands-on work so missing classes and "getting the notes" will not suffice. Plan on showing up to all of the classes or don't take this course.
We will adhere only vaguely to the following course outline:
WEEK TOPIC
1 Material culture: Introduction
2 Experimental Archaeology: Term Project
3 Introduction to stone tools: A dictionary of concepts I
(read all of Crabtree)
4 Introduction to stone tools: A dictionary of concepts II
(read all of Crabtree again)
5 Lithic Replication—Oldowan
6 Lithic Replication—Acheulean
7 Lithic Replication—Acheulean
8 Lithic Replication—Mousterian
9 Lithic Replication—Anatomically modern Homo sapiens and Pyramid
10 Lithic Replication—Anatomically modern Homo sapiens and Obelisk
11 Experimental analysis of tool use I and Stonehenge
12 Experimental analysis of tool use II and The Inca
13 Experimental analysis of debitage and The Coliseum
14 Projects
15 Projects
Text: Donald Crabtree: An Introduction to Flintknapping
Grading: Mid-term, final exam (each worth 25% of your final grade) and a term project (worth 50% of your final grade).
EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY PROJECT
A major part of this course will be your term project - done either
singly or in a group of no more than two. The project involves your
conducting an archaeologically relevant experiment of your own
choosing. The steps involved in this project should include:
1. choosing a question or issue in archaeological analysis or
material culture studies,
2. formulating an hypothesis (or hypotheses) regarding the issue you
have chosen,
3. formulating a procedure for testing the hypothesis,
4. researching relevant archaeological and/or ethnographic
literature,
5. designing the experiment,
6. conducting the experiment,
7. writing up the results of your experiment and formulating the
conclusions that can be drawn from the results of your research and
experiment.
While your experiment will almost certainly involve replication,
merely attempting to copy an ancient technology is not sufficient
rationale for the project you have selected. Archaeological
experiments, including your own are conducted to answer questions.
The following are examples of reasonable experiments for your
consideration; you are not bound to do any of these.
I. The invention of ceramic technology. Was pottery invented
through the accidental burning of clay lined basketry?
II. Projectile accuracy and efficiency. A comparison of
accuracy and deadliness of the spear, spear with spear thrower, and
bow and arrow.
III. Diagnostic wear patterns. Can the wear patterns left on
stone tools be used to accurately assess tool use?
IV. Ceramic manufacture. Can different techniques of ceramic
manufacture be determined from fragmentary pottery remains.
In two weeks (September 18), you should have an idea for a project.
On September 25, you will hand in a one page description of what you
plan to do with a least a general discussion of the question to be
approached or hypothesis tested, your planned experimental procedure,
and a short description of where you intend to obtain the background
information necessary for conducting your experiment.
During the course of the semester I will ask for updates in class for
how things are coming. You will discuss the results of your project
on the last day of class. The final write-up is due on the last day
of class.
Following are images of some of the completed term projects produced by students in the course in the fall semester, 1996. Each project involved researching the material culture of a particular group of people, obtaining authentic raw materials, and then replicating some aspect of ancient technology.










DATA ANALYSIS
ANTH 375
Alright. So most of you are math phobics and you got into anthropology to avoid any contact with numbers or calculation. Well, guess what? Mathematics and especially statistics are vital concerns of anthropologists of all stripes. In the social sciences, no less so than in the physical sciences, you need to know how to manipulate and analyze numerical data and you can't do that without statistics. And its fun. Really. I mean it. Stop snickering. Don’t make me stop this car…Sorry, I lost track of who I was talking to.
This is a course in anthropology, not statistics. Try to remember that while you are using up the batteries on your calculator. Yes, we will be doing lots of math, but all of the examples you will be using constitute actual anthropological data sets. Once you get used to the math, examining real data and coaxing some new insights out of the data sets can actually be fun. Really! I swear.
We will follow the following basic schedule: Thursdays will be lecture days where new concepts and procedures will be introduced. On each Thursday, a homework assignment will be given where you will be asked to apply the newly learned technique. You will hand in the assignment on the following Tuesday and at that point it will be gone over in class. I will grade them (scale: 0-5) and hand them back on the following Thursday. The topics we will cover include:
1. Logical thought
2. Are you “above average?” Descriptive statistics
3. the Normal distribution
4. Probability
5. t-test, Difference of means, etc.
6. Mann-Whitney, Runs, Wilcoxon
7. Fisher's, Chi-Square
8. Nearest neighbor analysis
9. Correlation/Regression
10. The Donner Party Take Home Final
11. Computer Applications
12. Computer Applications
13. Computer Applications
14. Computer Applications
You will need a calculator for this class. Beyond addition/subtraction, multiplication/division, it should do square roots AND factorials (n! button on the calculator). If you don’t have one, get one (they are not expensive). Bring it to class!
Your grade will be based on your weekly assignments (75%) and a take home final exam (25%). No assignments will be accepted for a grade after the beginning of the class in which it is due (there would be no point since we go over the assignment in class); but you must hand in late assignments anyway. You will be excused from two assignments (a late will be forgiven or a poor grade will be dropped) when your final grade is calculated, but do not fail to hand in an assignment even if it is late. Late assignments will be accepted (and graded as a ‘0’) only within one week of their due date. Each assignment not handed in within the one-week grace period will bring your final score for the class down half a grade. Bottom line: don’t miss any of the assignments and get them all in on time! Other bottom line: attendance is absolutely mandatory for this class. Miss more than three classes, you flunk the course. Okay; take off your socks and get ready to count to more than ten.